### Nuprl Lemma : p-int_wf

`∀[p:ℕ+]. ∀[k:ℤ].  (k(p) ∈ p-adics(p))`

Proof

Definitions occuring in Statement :  p-int: `k(p)` p-adics: `p-adics(p)` nat_plus: `ℕ+` uall: `∀[x:A]. B[x]` member: `t ∈ T` int: `ℤ`
Definitions unfolded in proof :  p-adics: `p-adics(p)` uall: `∀[x:A]. B[x]` member: `t ∈ T` p-int: `k(p)` subtype_rel: `A ⊆r B` all: `∀x:A. B[x]` so_lambda: `λ2x.t[x]` nat_plus: `ℕ+` decidable: `Dec(P)` or: `P ∨ Q` iff: `P `⇐⇒` Q` and: `P ∧ Q` not: `¬A` rev_implies: `P `` Q` implies: `P `` Q` false: `False` prop: `ℙ` uiff: `uiff(P;Q)` uimplies: `b supposing a` subtract: `n - m` top: `Top` le: `A ≤ B` less_than': `less_than'(a;b)` true: `True` int_seg: `{i..j-}` nat: `ℕ` guard: `{T}` satisfiable_int_formula: `satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)` exists: `∃x:A. B[x]` lelt: `i ≤ j < k` so_apply: `x[s]` int_upper: `{i...}`
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalRule sqequalReflexivity sqequalTransitivity computationStep isect_memberFormation introduction cut dependent_set_memberEquality lambdaEquality extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality applyEquality because_Cache hypothesis lambdaFormation setElimination rename addEquality natural_numberEquality dependent_functionElimination unionElimination independent_pairFormation voidElimination productElimination independent_functionElimination independent_isectElimination isect_memberEquality voidEquality intEquality minusEquality approximateComputation dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry applyLambdaEquality axiomEquality

Latex: